There is an old saying in the law: If the facts are against you, argue the law. If the law is against you, argue the facts. If the law and the facts are against you, yell like crazy and try to distract them.
Quick, can anybody tell me one ISSUE that RINOs and/or now Democrats are running on against Christine O’Donnell? Anybody? Bueller? Bueller?
Nope. Neither can I. It’s all “she once advocated against masturbation” [probably until she tried it], or she believes the earth is 6,000 years old [can’t blame her there–I’m skeptical of all so-called “scientists” as I’ve seen their work on global warming]. Or gets this really hot burning issue: She claimed to have graduated from college but her diploma was withheld until she paid her entire debt. Oh, and here’s another tried and true winner: she’s not a millionaire! But notice that nobody is taking issue with any of her stated positions?
Granted, some might argue that she has no political experience so how can they disagree with her on actual votes that she has taken? I’ve never voted on anything, either, but I think most readers here know how I would vote on most issues. Right Sheldon? ;)
Her campaign has been on cutting spending in Washington. And that resonates with the voters. So much so that the Bearded Marxist Opponent is also touting his fiscal responsibility on his website. His strategy? To lie and disassemble his record so that voters won’t see what a leftist he is, and to try to pass himself off as a moderate. I call it the Obama-lite strategy, because that is what King Obama did in order to reach the presidency.