DOJ Files Suit Against Arizona Over SB1070

The U.S. Justice Department on Tuesday filed a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of Arizona’s new law targeting illegal immigrants, setting the stage for a clash between the federal government and the state over the nation’s toughest immigration crackdown.

The lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in Phoenix argues that Arizona’s law requiring state and local police to question and possibly arrest illegal immigrants during the enforcement of other laws such as traffic violations usurps federal authority.

“In our constitutional system, the federal government has pre-eminent authority to regulate immigration matters,” the lawsuit says. “This authority derives from the United States Constitution and numerousacts of Congress. The nation’s immigration laws reflect a careful and considered balance of national law enforcement, foreign relations, and humanitarian interests.”

The government is seeking an injunction to delay the July 29 implementation of the law until the case is resolved. It ultimately wants the law declared invalid.

The government contends that the Arizona law violates the supremacy clause of the Constitution, a legal theory that says federal laws override state laws. It is already illegal underfederal law to be in the country illegally, but Arizona is the first state to make it a state crime and add its own punishment and enforcement tactics.

State Sen. Russell Pearce, the principal sponsor of the bill co-sponsored by dozens of fellow Republican legislators, denounced the lawsuit as “absolute insult to the rule of law” as well as to Arizona and its residents.

“It’s outrageous and it’s clear they don’t want (immigration) laws enforced. What they want is to continue their non-enforcement policy,” Pearce said. “They ignore the damage to America, the cost to our citizens, the deaths” tied to border-related violence.

State Rep. Kyrsten Sinema, a Phoenix Democrat who opposes the law, said the suit should help settle questions over what states can do when they don’t think federal laws are being adequately enforced.

“I hope this galvanizes Congress to gain the moral courage they need to address this (immigration) crisis,” Sinema said.

Tuesday’s action has been expected for weeks. President Barack Obama has called the state law misguided. Supporters say it is a reasonable reaction to federal inaction on immigration.

Gov. Jan Brewer’s spokesman called the decision to sue “a terribly bad decision.”

“Arizona obviously has a terrible border security crisis that needs to be addressed, so Gov. Brewer has repeatedly said she would have preferred the resources and attention of the federal government would be focused on that crisis rather than this,” spokesman Paul Senseman said.

Three of the five Democrats in Arizona’s congressional delegation, who are facing tough re-election battles, had also urged Obama not to try to block the law from going into effect.

Republican Sens. Jon Kyl and John McCain of Arizona also lashed out at the administration’s decision, saying “the American people must wonder whether the Obama Administration is really committed to securing the border when it sues a state that is simply trying to protect its people by enforcing immigration law.”

The law requires officers, while enforcing other laws, to question a person’s immigration status if there’s areasonable suspicion that they are in the country illegally.

Arizona passed the law after years of frustration over problems associated with illegal immigration, includingdrug trafficking and violent kidnappings. The state is the biggest gateway into the U.S. for illegal immigrants, and is home to an estimated 460,000 illegal immigrants.

Obama addressed the Arizona law in a speech on immigration reform last week. He touched on one of the major concerns of federal officials, that other states were poised to follow Arizona by crafting their own immigration enforcement laws.

“As other states and localities go their own ways, we face the prospect that different rules for immigration will apply in different parts of the country,” Obama said. “A patchwork of local immigration rules where we all know one clear national standard is needed.”

The law makes it a state crime for legal immigrants to not carry their immigration documents and bans day laborers and people who seek their services from blocking traffic on streets.

The law also prohibits government agencies from having policies that restrict the enforcement of federal immigration law and lets Arizonans file lawsuits against agencies that hinder immigration enforcement.

Arizona State University constitutional law professor Paul Bender said the federal government’s involvement throws a lot of weight behind the argument that federal law pre-empts Arizona’s measure.

“It’s important to have the federal government’s view of whether state law is inconsistent with federal law, and they’re the best people to say that,” Bender said.

Kris Kobach, the University of Missouri-Kansas City law professor who helped draft the Arizona law, said he’s not surprised by the Justice Department’s challenge but called it “unprecedented and unnecessary.”

He noted that the law already is being challenged by the American Civil Liberties Union and other groups opposed to the new statute.

“The issue was already teed up in the courts. There’s no reason for the Justice Department to get involved. The Justice Department doesn’t add anything by bringing their own lawsuit,” Kobach said in an interview.

Reported by LTB, care of AP

8 responses to “DOJ Files Suit Against Arizona Over SB1070

  1. Pingback: Obama vs Arizona round up | The Daley Gator

  2. Now here’s a conundrum wrapped in an enigma…

    The government is seeking an injunction to delay the July 29 implementation of the law until the case is resolved. It ultimately wants the law declared invalid.

    So we’ve considered the honest, legal reasoning fer their request…and in our consummate, ultimate, inimitable manner have riddledtheir purpose…?

    May the good Lord luv us all…!

  3. USA should be for European-Whites only. All others out of here! Support SB 1070; donate money to the Arizona Governor to help defend the law.

  4. Gramps:

    If the Federal Government had done their part, this suit would not be an issue. It’s not all Obama’s fault, but telling Congressmen he won’t secure the borders unless he gets his way on Amnesty certainly make him complicit.

    And I will bet you a bottle of “wodka” the courts uphold the law.

    Richard: you must be fking kidding me! Dude, you’re hood is on too tight, cutting off blood flow to your microscopic Aryan brain. Although I do agree with your assertion of support for SB 1070. But I will never in any capacity support racism.


  5. From wench yea pick grapes from without the shaded valley…some may be sweet and others very sour…!

  6. Seems like the racists are coming out of the woodwork…kinda like” La Cucarachas”…That’s cockroaches for the uninitiated.

    I don’t have anything against immigrants, Mexican or otherwise, as long as they’re LEGAL. And I like most black folks. Some of the finest people I knew were Black.

    Racism is the scourge of our country right now and we need to get a handle on it. We need to excoriate the people on both sides of the political spectrum who practice racism, Black or White, Immigrant or bonifide American.


  7. Lipton T. Bagg


    And as such, see my comment above.


    • LTB…
      With respect to my fat fingered response above

      My rather randy noun “wench” was supposed to be the rather innocuous verb “wince”…

      Geezers will be geezers…!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s