Remember Hillary Clinton changed the rules to allow gay diplomats equal benefits for their queer partners as heterosexual diplomats received for their wives? But let some heterosexual embassy guards who hire whores and piss on themselves? They get fired.
“Clinton has “zero tolerance” for the behavior described and has directed a “review of the whole system” for farming out security to private contractors that may have threatened the safety of embassy personnel, Kelly [a spokes person] said.”
Now, if these guys had just been queers, all would be forgiven
Let’s see, what’s worse, pissin on somebody or what queers do? Never mind, I don’t want to compare varying depths of depravity. The point is, what the hell is Clinton doing drawing lines like this? Hiring [heterosexual] whores, boozing it up, and pissin on each other on your own time: BAD! ZERO TOLERANCE! FIRING OFFENSE! Giving each other proctological exams with members of the same sex: GOOD! TOTAL TOLERANCE! EQUAL BENEFITS!
What a hypocrite. How can you condemn one set of sinful behavior but condone another? Oh, the depths to which liberals will dive to defend deviant behavior. Don’t get me wrong, I support firing such perverts. We don’t need such behavior when they are sort of representatives of our country in another country. But I oppose equal benefits for queer diplomats. For the same reason.
p.s. Not to mention Hitlery’s own husband, who went around raping, sexually abusing subordinates, serial womanizing, etc. ad nauseum. Why didn’t she fire him?