From the Washington Post. Erroll Southers, President Obama’s nominee to head the Transportation Security Adminstration, told two tales which obviously are inconsistent. Of course, he says his inconsistencies about his conduct were “inadvertent.”
Here’s what he did: Twenty years ago when he was with the FBI, his wife moved in with a boyfriend, so he accessed a federal database to snoop on the boyfriend. That was illegal. The WaPo tries to sugar-coat his breaking of the law by writing that his actions were “possibly in violation of privacy laws…” No “POSSIBLY” about it–they were a clear violation.
Then he lied about it to the U.S. Senate. Back in October 2009 he claimed in an affidavit–that is a document sworn to under oath– to a Senate committe that he had asked someone in the local police to access the records for him, and he described it as an “isolated” incident. He was trying to distance himself and make the offense less egregious. In other words, “I didn’t actually do it, and it only happened once.”
But it turns out that he, himself, accessed the records. And not just once–an “isolated” incident–but twice. Is that two “isolated” incidents? Or a pair of isolated incidents. Or just the only two times he got caught? Reminds me of the song “The twelve days of Christmas.” “…Two “isolated” incidences, and a perjury in Congress.” Maybe we can get some songwriter to finish it for me. Continue reading

