Monthly Archives: May 2009

Sometimes I am soooo cutting edge that I scare myself: MORE evidence of political payback in decision about which Chrysler dealerships get closed

022609oshitFor you liberals, it is called “thinking for yourself” instead of lapping up what the dailykos and HuffPo tell you to think.  Last week I posted about how a Republican Chrysler dealership owner that was discontinued was a Republican member of the U.S. House of Representatives.  I speculated that it was because he was a Republican legislator, not in spite of that fact.  

Now it turns out even more evidence is emerging that Chrysler dealerships were discontinued based upon their political affiliations. Supposedly, every single one of the owners of those dealerships that were discontinued were contributors to Republican campaigns.  See “Red Alert: Did anti-Obama political donations dictate which Chrysler dealerships got shuttered?”   This isn’t over. It hasn’t even begun yet.

Colin Powell is a coward

There is a reason why Colin Powell has much higher poll numbers than Rush Limbaugh.  Nobody knows what Powell stands for on any issue. Hard to disagree smellliberalsyw3with somebody like that.  That’s like asking you liberals out there who I know hate fear me whether you like me (an outspoken advocate of conservatism) or my wonderful wife better. She teaches pre-school and Sunday School and does volunteer work.  Without knowing anything about her, you and all the despicable moderates out there would choose my wife over me any day. Gutless moderates and hardcore liberals prefer the unknown to the devil they know. 

Just shuckin' and jivin'

Just shuckin' and jivin'

Nobody out there knows a damn thing about where Colin Powell stands on any issue. Except that he is against Rush Limbaugh (oooooh! It’s so brave to be against somebody with approval ratings in the 20s. not!), and he is for Obama (whose ratings are in the 60s).  Hmmm. What’s not to like? War vet, general, handsome, intelligent “moderate” who supports a popular President. But I’m sure he would start losing support from both sides when his positions became known on various issues. Course he is too cowardly to let his positions be known.  Sir, you’ve been sitting behind the lines far too long, letting others do the fighting for you. Engage. Get the hell to where the battle is raging. Then let’s see what you are made of. It’s easy to sit back and criticize those who are doing the fighting. You would find, if you weren’t so cowardly, that it isn’t so easy when you actually enunciate a position and then get attacked viciously by the liberals when they disagree with you. Coward.

[This is straight from Rush's monologue today, but it is absolutely true.]

The problems with promoting a judge based on the color of his or her skin

I’ve seen first-hand how judges get promoted based on the color of their skin.  Here in the Richmond, Virginia area. First, one of the best Judges whom I have ever appeared before was black. He was Judge Randall Johnson (now deceased), Circuit Court for the City of Richmond. But there are others who are complete jokes. There are some white judges who are jokes, as well.

Granted, it would be awkward having all lily white judges in Richmond, a city with a population that has (I think) a black majority. The problem is that white lawyers out-number black lawyers something like 75-1 (I’m guessing). And that is the pool from which come judges.  So when a black judge is chosen, guess what my first reaction is? Affirmative action. That judge just happens to be the best candidate? And the last judge chosen was black, too? And just coincidentally, the few times that I appeared before some of them, they sure did not appear to be intellectual heavyweights (I’m being charitable).  Likewise, there is a white female judge nearby, who  judging by her ability as a judge was appointed solely because she has dirty pictures to blackmail somebody in very high places.  Continue reading

A white male would be better than a Latina woman for Supreme Court Justice

What do Latina women know? Housework and picking fruit? Leave Ku-Klux-Klanthe heavy thinking to the white males who made this country great. Perhaps one can aspire to be a nanny–if they promise not to steal the silverware. Now, you are probably thinking, “This proves, once and for all, that John Doe is a racist pig. And you would be right. If I was serious. But I am just parroting what Obama’s choice for Supreme Court Justice herself said, in reverse. A disclaimer: the quote is up on Drudge and links to the NYTs. I don’t go there out of principle. Something about getting polluted just by reading their lies and rubbish. So if she didn’t really say it, disregard this entire rant. But if she did she is a racist bitch. A RACIST FUCKING BITCH, who has absolutely no place on the Supreme Court of the United States. Period. End of story. I mean, she is in KKK-land.  That is what I would expect from some white dude wearing a hood and standing around a burning cross! Any white conservative male who said something like that in reverse would be automatically disqualified.  

 Here is the alleged quote from Drudge: “I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experience would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male…”  

Now, John, you might say, she is just standing up to the white good ole boys and elitists who frequent Harvard and Yale as 4th generation trust fund babies, and who grow up to be inside traders and back scratchers and overseers of the status quo, while looking out only for themselves and their friends and acquaintances. But that is not what she said. I am as disgusted and distrustful of such white males as she is. She just scooped us all up into one big racist bunch and pissed all over us.  Dumb bitch belongs in the kitchen, doing somebody else’s dishes.  Two can play this racist, mysogenist game, you likely to be carpet muncher. Whatever happened to “judging a man” [or woman] “by the content of his character instead of the color of his skin”?  You disgust me, you racist pig. Get the hell out of my country.

God Bless America

Thank God for all those men and women who have fought for America over the years.

Memorial Day began back in 1868: 

“It was first widely observed on May 30, 1868, to commemorate the sacrifices of Civil War soldiers, by proclamation of General John A. Logan of the Grand Army of the Republic, an organization of former sailors and soldiers. On May 5, 1868, Logan declared in General Order No. 11 that:

“The 30th of May, 1868, is designated for the purpose of strewing with flowers, or otherwise decorating the graves of comrades who died in defense of their country during the late rebellion, and whose bodies now lie in almost every city, village, and hamlet churchyard in the land. In this observance no form of ceremony is prescribed, but posts and comrades will in their own way arrange such fitting services and testimonials of respect as circumstances may permit.”

VIVIAN PAIGE: IS THERE ANYTHING IN THE ENTIRE UNIVERSE THAT IS CONTEMPTIBLE? WHERE YOU DRAW THE LINE AND SAY ENOUGH IS ENOUGH?

Killing unborn children doesn’t do it for you. Publicly supporting queers doesn’t (I’m not talking about loving them despite their sins, I’m talking excusing their sin, and claiming it really isn’t sin). How about if we go back to the days of calling folks nigger? How about if we re-instate “separate but equal” under the cloak of “freedom”? Does your cavalier attitude towards sin go that far? Does your out of whack sense of right and wrong descend to that level? If Liberty banned the use of the term “nigger” would that cause you to whine ”so much for liberty at Liberty”?   

I get the fact that you are a misguided moron, a godless heathen without morals, and that you mistakenly believe that calling something a sin is equal to hating the person caught doing the sin. But I am serious. Is there any depravity, any sin which you would not allow under the banner of “freedom”? Would you allow theft? Thieves should be allowed the “freedom” to be thefts at Liberty? I really want to know the answer…

What REALLY pisses Democrats off about the Liberty University ban of college Democrats

They hate to be reminded of how ungodly their party has

I hope my mommy isn't a Democrat!

I hope my mommy isn't a Democrat!

 become. Not all Democrats, just most of them. Not all of their platform of ideas, just some really big issues. Democrats support the legalization of murder of unborn children. As Jesus will tell them when he comes back, or they go to him, that is a really big issue in his book. A deal breaker. An if-you-accept-that-as-a-part-of-the-Democrat-platform, then-I-am-out-of- here issue. I won’t even get started on the gay marriage crap. 

Look at what happened to the formerly great Democrat party. You have in just a few decades gone from the party that stands up for the helpless, to the party that advocates killing the helpless. And you are so “open-minded,” so “tolerant”, and damn proud of it, that even if you personally abhor abortion, you still willingly allow those who have no problem with abortion to force their views to be the only acceptable option for Democrat candidates and speakers. Think about this–no pro-life speaker is even allowed to speak at the Democratic Party Convention. Pro-life on issues is the death knell for Democrat candidates. And some of you gutless opponents of abortion support that party.

The wonder is that it took this long for Liberty U to stand up and call the Democrat party on the godless stance that has overtaken your party.  Undoubtedly they feared the firestorm that has indeed come to pass by them taking a firm stance against ungodliness.

And I hope that they emphasize at the same time that they are not too pleased with the Republican party, either. The Pubs are corrupt, inept and gutless. But at least they don’t officially endorse as a party platform the murder of innocent babies. [Great endorsement of the Pub party, eh? At least they aren't as shitty as the Democratic Party. Yeehaaa!]

enochBut you idiots attack Liberty for taking a stand. Because they are pointing out your mistake.  Oh, you dress it up in  flowery language. They are closed-minded, you say. That is anti-free speech. Blah blah blah. But what is really going on is that they are pissing you off. As the Old Testament Prophets used to be reviled when they condemned the ungodly, so too is Liberty U reviled by the ungodly today.

Is Liberty perfect?  Hell no. But they are absolutely correct in this instance. Just a little late to the party. I suspect the reaction of some to Obama’s Notre Dame speech finally startled them out of their slumber. Who says protest doesn’t work? But whatever the reason, I welcome them now.

And to you Democrats who have sat back and allowed your party to be polluted by the godless abomination that is called “pro-choice” I say this: I feel for you. I understand what it must feel like to have liberals take over a formerly great institution and pollute it and change it into a worthless piece of shit organization. You are heavily invested in the party. But your party changed. Either take it back, or leave. I am convinced that God would not have you act any other way.

The different degrees of Republicans explained, and where they go wrong

Degree of Republican Number One:

What I Call Them: Cop-outs. (also acceptable: ex-hippies, who grew up, became conservative, stopped Praised_be_Jesus_Christ3smoking dope but retained the cop-out attitude. Or they are religious, in which case they are Amish, Monks, Nuns, etc.)  You will have to read to the end of this article to understand why they cop out.
What They Cannot Understand: Government is not perfect, because neither is society, but that is the very reason that good people have to be involved. If all the good people cop-out to avoid being polluted–or disappointed–by politics, only the bad (or misinformed) people will be left to run the government. They are natural Republican allies, but not of much use.
What They Want to Prove About Themselves: They are in the world, not of it. They are not polluted by the culture, “The Man”, the philosophy or the modernity of society.
How to Spot Them: They are non-political. They do not vote. They are uninformed about politics, and they take pride in that fact. They also wear funny clothes. It is good to know that they are out there, but they are not of much use to The Cause.
Where They Go Astray: Good intentions sometimes are not enough. You can indeed be too heavenly-minded to be any earthly good.

 

Degree of Republican Number Two:

What I Call Them: My Daddy was a Republican (Or my Hubby). (You also see a lot of Christians who have this attitude: My Family was Christian, so I am too). 
What They Cannot Understand: It really is necessary to think for yourself and to adopt beliefs in which you, yourself really believe.
What They Want to Prove About Themselves: That they hold to the same philosophy/faith that their Daddy/Hubby/Church taught.                                                                                                                          Where They Go Astray: God gave you a brain—use it! And if you do not know enough about a topic, it is acceptable to say that you have not yet come to a conclusion on that particular issue. Then go out and edgeumakate educate yourself about that issue. Do not just parrot the conclusion of Daddy/Hubby/Church. 

 

Degree of Republican Number Three:

What I Call Them: Libertarians. 
What They Cannot Understand: They confuse “Liberty” with “Licentiousness.” Society devolves into chaos without certain rules and regulations. They don’t call it “civilization” for nothing.                                                                                 What They Want to Prove About Themselves: pot smoker   That they are so open-minded that anything that consenting adults do in private is fine by them. [Yeah, and most of libertarians smoke dope.]                              Where They Go Astray: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” They forget what made America great. Strong work ethic. Family values. Morals. And they buy into the liberal godless heathen belief that The Constitution forbids legislation based upon morals and beliefs based solely upon The Bible.  This would shock the Founding Fathers who wrote The Declaration, The Constitution and The Bill of Rights. Besides, there were good reasons besides just morals and The Bible why our Forefathers put certain restrictions on behavior. Society “works” better if sex is confined within marriage of a man and a woman. Society “works” better if people are not left to do whatever they want, when they want it. Societies devolve to the lowest common denominator. Fast.  And once a society devolves to the point where anything goes, anything goes.  Bullfights? Check. Chariot races and Gladiators? Check. Burn Christians at the stake? Double check.   Humans are animals? Check. Abortion? Check. Holocaust? Double check. These people are smart enough to realize that economic conservative is best because it works, but not quite smart enough to realize that social conservatism works because it, too, “works.” Continue reading

Bring back SHAME

There was a reason women were called sluts. There was a reason, even if it was misguided, why adultresses were labeled with a crimson letter A. Single parenthood bad, mother and father parenthood good. Now they are openly admired.  See photo to left.  I know it is politically incorrect and will further inflame every liberal’s belief that I am a racist, but African American women need to be shamed. Too many are stupid. (I know, I know, many whiteys and yellows and browns need to be shamed as much or more.) But for crying out loud, the rate of black African-American unwed motherhood is as out of control as Bill Clinton amongst a gaggle of interns. So I’ll direct this at black women, just to piss off liberals, but realize this is directed at all women. Just don’t tell the liberals. I enjoy pissing them off. ;) Continue reading

My take on President Obama: Give the Devil his due.

Olbermann gives Obama "intense scrutiny"

Olbermann gives Obama "intense scrutiny"

I despise the man. I despise how he lied, out-right lied, every chance he got in order to get elected. I hate his political philosophy, his ears, his racism, his pandering, even his sissy way of speaking  (anybody else notice how he hisses when words end with the letter S? warsssss.  carssssss. toyssss.).  I hated him for his campaign promises when he made them, because I believed that every one of them was made in a calculated attempt to get elected. Not because he believed them, but because he was opportunistic enough and manipulative enough to get away with saying and doing anything in order to win. And I hate him for the campaign promises that he has kept. And I hate him for the way his particular brand of bull shit was so effective in rallying the  frothing at the mouth liberal anti-American godless heathens that are the Democratic base.

But I’ll give the Devil his due. Some of the promises that he is breaking, or at least moving towards breaking, mean he at least is somewhat responsible when it comes to foreign affairs. He has stepped up attacks by drones over Pakistan.  He hasn’t rushed to release all the prisoners in Guantanimo (yet).  I know that these are precisely the same reasons that give his aforementioned base the most concern about his new Presidency. Maybe that is why I mention it here.  But the rest of his Presidency has been an absolute disaster. I can’t wait until 2012. And did I mention that I hate President Obama?