Who does “Loudoun Insider” consider to be examples of a “Republican wingnuts”?

California Republicans who opposed any new taxes for any reason. That is, assuming he read the article  he cited in his article at “Too Conservative.”  He cited an article written by his little heroin Kathleen Parker as so-called evidence that Republicans are too extreme. The article says that a big Republican donor in California switched party affiliations “in a word”* because of the California Republicans refusal to raise taxes.  What do Republicans who oppose raising taxes get called by “Loudoun Insider”? Why, intransigent “Republican wingnuts” and “Puritans” and “fringe hardliners,” that’s what.

So, let me get this straight, “Loudoun Insider”: You call yourself a Republican, and you see yourself as part of the silent majority” of Virginia Republicans.  You demonize fellow Republicans who oppose raising taxes, and you want like-minded ”moderates” to “take back the GOP from these “Puritans” (who “scare the crap” out of you).  Did you ever consider getting out of Northern Virginia to see whether in fact people like  you really are the “silent majority” as opposed to a few simmered frogs steeped too long in the ever hotter and hotter water that is NoVA? Further, did you ever consider changing out of your frilly little Republican panties and trying on a pair of Democrat panties instead? I’m guessing the Democrat pair would fit you much better. Less chafing, less embarrassing leaks, better protection for when those big bad “Puritans scare the crap out of you.”  Face the facts, Mr. “Moderate”–if you are going to walk like a Democrat and talk like a Democrat, you might as well call yourself a Democrat. And don’t let the door hit  you on the ass on your way out.

*”In a rare interview Thursday, Ahmanson shared some of his thoughts about why he switched parties. In a word, taxes.”

“Specifically, he was offended by the California Republican Party’s insistence during a recent state budget battle that there would be no tax increases for any reason, no matter what. “They’re providing one issue, and it’s just a very silly issue,” Ahmanson told me by telephone.”