This is news that you will not see anywhere else.
First, the quote and the date that it was supposedly made by Rush: “You know who deserves a posthumous Medal of Honor? James Earl Ray. We miss you, James. Godspeed. [4/23/98]” Rush never said it. It was made up back in about 2005 and this article proves it.
I am no computer research guru, but I was able to track down enough to prove that this quote first arose back in the fall of 2005, and there is no evidence of the quote before that date. Bottom line, it is inconceivable that such a quote was made by Rush Limbaugh back in 1998 and then never got any attention on the internet or elsewhere until 2005.
Here is what I found, taken directly from articles found on the internet, with citations so you can look it up if you want.
The earliest mention of the alleged quote was on September 9th, 2005 by zedlappy who wrote this about what Rush allegedly said: “You know who deserves a posthumous Medal of Honor? James Earl Ray. We miss you, James. Godspeed. [4/23/98]” ”zedlappy” cited to a Wikipedia article as his source. For those newbys, Wikipedia is a cite that anybody can make shit up and it gets quoted as authority by idiots. Hereafter, every time I reference the Wikipedia article I am talking about this one. Unfortunately, it apparently has been edited many times since 2005, so we can’t know exactly what it said then. But now it attributes the quote to Rush Limbaugh, but lists it as “DISPUTED” because the article currently lists the source of the quote to a book “101 Persons who are really SCREWING up America“ by (2006) by Jack Huberman. Hereinafter I’ll call the book “101 Persons.” But note, the book came out in 2006 so it could not possibly be the source of the original Wikipedia article! ALSO NOTE: The Huberman book does not list a source! On 9/22/05 [again before the book "101 Persons" was published] somebody calling himself “Cobra” lists the exact same quote and cited as his authority the exact same Wikipedia article! “You know who deserves a posthumous Medal of Honor? James Earl Ray. We miss you, James. Godspeed. [4/23/98]”

A few days later on 10/08/05, on another blog site, the same guy, “Cobra” made the same quote (hard to read because print is so small)! And guess what, he cited the same Wikipedia article that lists the quote as disputed! Again, this was before the book “101 People…” came out.
A week later, on a different blog, “Cobra” did the same thing!
On 11/12/05 [STILL before the book came out] someone calling themselves “Voter” wrote the exact same quote: “You know who deserves a posthumous Medal of Honor? James Earl Ray. We miss you, James. Godspeed.? [The Rush Limbaugh Show 4/23/98]
Evidently, “Cobra” was still making this exact same claim in 2006 ON A STILL DIFFERENT blog site, when he was contemporaneously busted for making this shit all up! Pay attention, the following is taken directly from a comment back on 7/31/06:
[Cobra wrote:] “myself find it hard to have sympathy for a guy who makes quotes like:
““You know who deserves a posthumous Medal of Honor? James Earl Ray. We miss you, James. Godspeed. [4/23/98]”
“Cobra
“It took me five minutes to research google on that quote and in several of the links on the very first google page it was cited by, guess who… Cobra himself. (And that is without adding “cobra” to the search terms.) And he’s been citing it going on a year now. If anyone is wondering why Cobra doesn’t provide a link, it’s not because he doesn’t want to. You see, he did often link, in the prior citations ( at LaShawn’s, for instance, on 10/08/06) to a Wikiquote article that now does not contain his cited quote. My guess is that someone edited a phony Limbaugh quote into Limbaugh’s entry and then Wikiquote removed it when they realized that it was a phony. No media source links. No transcript links.
“I can’t say I’m surprised to see your fingerprints on something as despicable as this, Cobra. I’m not shaking off any sense of shock.
“I think that falsely quoting anyone, let alone a public figure, is scumbag behavior. And Cobra has been making a habit of doing it to Limbaugh for a year now.
[Cobra tries to defend himself, saying he was citing Huber the author and an article on HuffPo discussing the book and which cited it, but the writer was relentless, saying it was Cobra who first made up the quote and the author then put it in his book. NOTE: Cobra was trying to attribute the quote to "101 Persons" and a HuffPo article about the book but both the book and HuffPo article came out in 2006! And Cobra had been repeating the quote since 2005.]
“Cobra, I did a little search on that James Earl Ray quote from Limbaugh. What I see is you, over and over, quoting that temporary Wikipedia thing like it’s the Encyclopedia Brittanica, and spreading it all over the blogosphere.
Thou shalt not bear false witness.”
AND, as if that wasn’t enough, I found where two other people discredited the quote back in 2005!
First, one person did not believe the quote and did some research about it back on or before 10/13/05 (comment is not dated, but a comment about the comment is dated 10/13/05): Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Smash! “You know who deserves a posthumous Medal of Honor? James Earl Ray. We miss you, James. Godspeed.” [4/23/98] – Rush on Martin Luther King’s assassin. |
“Well researched, Loren. I did Google searches too, and like you found that they only appear on Wikipedia. I didn’t know they were all from the same person, though… that pretty much clinches it IMO”
The new Axis of Evil: Obama, Pelosi, and Reid
Last edited by Samurai : 10-13-2005 at 05:22 PM.
End of quotes.
So, it appears to John Doe that this hullaballoo is all about a bogus quote that was made up back sometime in 2005, and has been repeated several times since then. It was recently quoted by Max Blumenthal thusly: he has called for a “posthumous Medal of Honor” for the assassin of Martin Luther King, Jr., James Earl Ray, The Blumental article was then mindlessly picked up and passed off as the truth by RockDem today.
I told those people at RockDem that it was a fake quote, but they have yet to take it down. Because it was false, I made a later post about Bubby being a hillbilly pedophile, just to show him how easy it is to make stuff up on the internet.
IMPORTANT UPDATE 5/12/09: Irish student intentionally made a false quote on Wikipedia and attributed it to a person who had just died. Newspapers around the world immediately began lifting the quote directly from Wikipedia and using it in the man’s obituary without in any way attempting to find if it was correct.
”I was really shocked at the results from the experiment,” Fitzgerald, 22, said Monday in an interview a week after one newspaper at fault, The Guardian of Britain, became the first to admit its obituarist lifted material straight from Wikipedia.
“I am 100 percent convinced that if I hadn’t come forward, that quote would have gone down in history as something Maurice Jarre said, instead of something I made up,” he said. “It would have become another example where, once anything is printed enough times in the media without challenge, it becomes fact.”
Wow. He just proved my point.
126 responses so far ↓
Videoman // November 23, 2009 at 1:56 pm |
Steve, after I re read what I wrote:
”All I’m saying is use the phrase ‘follow the money’ to find the truth” I realized I didn’t convey my thoughts well but your take on it is certainly one way to go.
I won’t use political parties to give a name to those that are for or against issues that have been made political. For the most part there isn’t any significant amount of money or power to be made by those in politics that in a responsable manor work to keep fuel prices/ dependency down or protect the enviorment. On the other hand not so much power but a big chunk of profits stand to be lost/ diverted by those who have long chosen to not self regulate and chose to do their business as usual or have investments in said business.
Granted…there are a few from both sides who’s new busines ventures stands to benifit by moving forward seeking alturnative fuels or being innovative by being a ‘green’ business. Maybe politically but financially speaking there is little to be gained by the left being proactive on fuel cost and enviormental issues and for the right wing…evidence and history shows that financially but not politically speaking there is a great amount to be gained by ignoring and denying the concerns with issues of fuel cost and enviorment.
Just because one sides solutions may not be responsable isn’t an excuse to deny there is an issue but it seems when all solutions result in reduced profits or added competition the direction to go is apathy. From a political standpoint some have stood back to see the big picture and realize they can no longer do nothing on issues if they want to stay in office. This is where talk radio makes it’s strategy. The adjenda of host like Rush and Beck is not only to inform it’s listeners with what I consider productive information but mostly to discredit the left by not only going after the bad ideas but going after every idea! Rather than listen to the half truths from both sides I ask the questions: who stands to gain the most…the rich or the poor and who stands to lose the most…the rich or the poor. The rich being those with power to directly financially support politicans and the poor being all other Americans that don’t.
It has become to common and plain to see for the extremist to watch after their own portfolio before they watch after the people that put them in office.
John Doe // November 23, 2009 at 2:36 pm |
Videoman and Steve, sheesh, you guys need to be more computer literate. Instead of just commenting on this particular post, why not go directly to my blog and comment on other posts? I enjoy comments from both of you, but it seems that you guys don’t read the rest of what I right. Let’s discuss more issues together, not just THIS issue (besides, we are way off track on this discussion). Hope to hear more from both of you!
Videoman // November 23, 2009 at 2:51 pm |
JD…I admit I’m pretty outta the loop on blog sites. I’d love to start my own if I knew more about how. The only way I found my way to this one was through Rushhhhhh’s site when he was raving on how he was left out of his NFL bid. I didn’t know what he was talking about so I followed the link. I expected more than me you and steve but I still found out what his ‘hub bub’ was all about. How can I find a list of the other blogs? PS…my last posting took me so long to write and then just sit on my to do list for weeks I decided to post it just because I didn’t want the effort to go to waste..lol
John Doe // November 23, 2009 at 3:29 pm |
Go up to the top of the page and left click on either “Front Page” or directly on “Smash Mouth Politics” in big letters. On the left hand side near the top, under the words “Blogroll” I have linked to some other important blog sites.
It is really easy to start your own blog. Also, I’m always looking for other writers to join me in contributing to this one. I would prefer some other voices who aren’t exactly clones of what I have to say. Ideally, I’d even like some who disagree with me, so long as they do so in a respectable manner. You are welcome to join me, or I’ll give you express details in how to start your own. It took about an hour and it is free.
Frankie, if yer out there, give me a shout if you are interested…